Friday, April 27, 2007

Friday catblogging

For today's catblogging, I'm posting a picture of Ooma doing what she does best - looking very fat and happy. I was going to post a picture I took of her at the vet the other day, but this picture of her before we went to the vet is really more in keeping with her spirit. We somehow have to figure out how to slim her down. Our fear is that if we start feeding her less so that she gets down to a normal weight (12 lbs is the goal, she's currently almost 15), our less, um, robust cats will shrink away to nothing.

Thursday, April 26, 2007

What's your daemon?

I think that Phillip Pullman's Dark Materials trilogy is pretty much one of the best set of books ever written. Take that Harry Potter! I was very excited when I heard that a film version of the Golden Compass was being filmed. I was somewhat less excited to learn that the director was going to be Chris Weitz of American Pie fame...


Anyway, I have been watching the genesis of this movie avidly and was a little broken-hearted when Mr. Boo left his company that was working on the movie. Luckily, New Line has created a fancy website whereby individuals can take a quiz to ascertain their daemons.

My daemon is a male osprey. I have to admit I was a little disappointed by this because I don't really see myself as a bird.

However, I think I did better than Mr. Boo. His daemon is a female jackal named Ariel (like the little mermaid). According to Dictionary.com, a jackal is:

1. any of several nocturnal wild dogs of the genus Canis, esp. C. aureus, of Asia and Africa, that scavenge or hunt in packs.
2. a person who performs dishonest or base deeds as the follower or accomplice of another.
3. a person who performs menial or degrading tasks for another.

I'm a little worried about the state of Mr. Boo's soul...

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Movie review: Hot Fuzz

Seeing as how I had the day off today and Ms. Boo was working, I decided to see Hot Fuzz. If you've seen Shaun of the Dead, then you know what to expect. The same kind of humor, only this time in a more Stepford Wives-type plot rather than a zombie flick. The film stars Simon Pegg (who also wrote it) as Nicholas Angel, a kind of super-cop with the London metro force. He is "promoted" to serve as Sergeant in a country bumpkin town because he makes everyone else look bad (with an arrest rate 400% higher than any other cop on the force). There, he meets slovenly partner Danny Butterman (Nick Frost, who was also Pegg's sidekick in Shaun). They quickly become man-friends, with Butterman learning something about being a true cop, which Angel learns to chill out and enjoy stupid cop movies like Point Break. All while townspeople myteriously die in suspicious accidents. The final act of the movie is a pure B-movie campy mayhem, unapologetically wallowing in gory FX and corny lines of dialog (bad guy with a spike in his throat says, "Oww, thith really hurtth" while the audience laughs).

The pacing is a bit slow at first, and it isn't until the movie reaches it reckless and silly climax that Pegg and director Edgard Wrights' style of film making shines. However, they really have a handle on intelligent "meta" movies that appeal to the fanboy in all of us, with beautiful tales of platonic man-love saving the day against unspeakable evil. All while winking at convention and bringing the audience along with them into the realm of pure silliniess. Overall, this is on of the most intelligent dumb movies I've seen in a while.

Overall Grade: B

Monday, April 23, 2007

Sophistication of electronics and everything


For any fans of Herbie Hancock or old-school electronic music, this is incredibly cool. Herbie Hancock showing Quincy Jones his new toy, a Fairlight CMI controller. My favorite part is 56 seconds in, when Jones casually takes a sip of wine from his glass. You know, just hanging out and drinking while they film this documentary. Also of note, 5 minutes in, the interviewer says, "Seeing you and Quincy here with all these instruments and this sophistication of electronics and everything, but still the, um, African blood, it, uh, really..." Not sure what that's all about. Anyway, enjoy.



Medical inefficiencies

Today I had a crazy experience. I was going to my allergist whose office is located in a five-story medical office building in Santa Monica. (Digression: I have a lot of problems with this building. For one thing, it's the only building I've ever been in where the top floors of the underground parking are allocated to the tenants. In other words, we patients drive around and around the parking garage, into the bowels of earth, passing row upon row of doctors' Mercedes and BMWs. And doctors are supposed to be just as disadvantaged by HMOS as patients? Digression ended.)

So when I'm going into the elevator this older woman and a very young woman who I think was her assistant are approaching the elevator as well, and the older woman falls down. She says she's ok, so I go into the elevator. I feel guilty though, so while I stand there I watch other people enter the elevator room and walk away from the woman, so assumed she was, in fact, all right.

When I left my allergist 20 minutes later, the two women are still in parking garage and the older woman is obviously NOT all right. The younger woman is in a panic because she can't reception on her cell phone (remember we're in the bowels of the earth) and the older woman is stretched out in a parking space groaning in pain. This is a very busy office building, and the elevator room is central to the parking lot, so others must have seen them and not helped them. So I volunteered to go up to the older woman's doctor's office and get the doctor. Turns out the office doesn't open for 15 minutes (remember the woman had already been on the ground for 20 minutes at this point.) So I go into the pharmacy and then my own doctor's office and told whoever I found that there's a woman in acute pain lying down in a parking space and is there anything you can do? It turns out no one knew who to call and the other medical professionals couldn't do anything because the woman wasn't their patient. Thus, I am in a five-story building full of doctors and no one would go to help her. When the woman's doctor's office finally opened, the receptionist said she would send someone down with a wheelchair, even though the woman clearly needed a stretcher. Apparently the physician in question was not in the office yet.

Long story short, another passerby ended up calling an ambulance to take the injured woman to an emergency room, which no doubt cost thousands of dollars as emergency visits are wont to do. I can understand the potential for lawsuits if someone touched the woman and further injured her, but damn, it seems like the health profession could be a little more patient-centered. Where are the doctors that you see on TV who are so passionate about helping their clients that they risk life and limb to do their duty? I guess they're just on TV. The moral of the story: Don't fall down in a doctor's office building because you ain't gonna get help.

(Another digression: This incident reminded me of the time that Mr. Boo and I were crossing the street with one of our friends and said friend got hit by a car making an oblivious right-hand turn. The driver got out of the car all panicky but the other cars at the intersection just backed up and drove around the body on the street. Said friend was not injured, but the incident did not improve my faith in human nature. Do you think this kind of disregard for others is endemic only to Los Angeles?)

Friday, April 20, 2007

Friday catblogging

In keeping with the proud internet tradition of friday catblogging (thanks Kevin Drum), we offer up the following.

This is Abbott, freshly shaven. I got him whipped up into a good and rumbly frenzy by rubbing his belly. Now he's somewhat settled down, doing his best imitation of the stuffed bear.

Funny story about that shaving. I was out of town last week, and when I got on the plane he was enormous and fuzzy. When I got back home, he had miraculously shed all of his fur. Ms. Boo claims to have had nothing to do with it, and no knowledge of how this transpired. I'm still suspicious.

Whither impeachment?

The one question looming over the entire Gonzales hearing is what will happen to him? I noticed that in a article written by Richard Schmitt in today's LA Times makes the point that Gonzales can only be removed by resigning or being fired by the President:

It is far from certain that Gonzales will be forced to step aside. The hearing produced no evidence to support the most provocative claim of his critics — that the firings were orchestrated to affect public corruption cases in a way that would aid Republicans. And while some senators fumed about the lack of detail that Gonzales offered, Congress is powerless to remove him from office.


However, other newspapers including this Boston Globe editorial from 3 weeks ago make the point that he should be impeached, as any sitting cabinet member in theory can be. As the Globe says,

But can the House impeach the attorney general? The Constitution is clear that Congress may impeach "all civil officers of the United States." In our history, the House has impeached two presidents, and just one member of the Cabinet, William Belknap, secretary of war under president Ulysses S. Grant.

I am certainly no lawyer, but the Constitution states very simply:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. Article II, Section 4.

Whether Gonzales' behavior is a "High Crime or Misdemeanor," I don't know. But it's pretty obvious that he falls under the category of a member of the Executive branch who can be impeached. In any case, it seems to me that the Globe has it right, which makes me wonder, why did Schmitt assert the opposite without acknowledging that the impeachability of a sitting AG is a debatable point? Poor research? Poor editorial control? A political agenda? This is an important point in the whole scandal, and the LA Times missed the mark.

Thursday, April 19, 2007

What's up with Gonzales?

Today is the first day since Monday that the lead story when I turned on the radio wasn't about the tragedy at Virgina Tech. Instead, our nation's Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, was trying to explain how he was both responsible for the attorney firing scandal and yet not to blame. Can you have it both ways? Mostly I was alarmed about how much information Gonzales "couldn't recall." Now I am a true believer that the nature of memory has changed in conjunction with our overprogrammed lives and technology that takes care of most mundane tasks. (I can't remember my best friend's phone number, for example.) However, it's beginning to seem like Gonzales is senile or something. I'm not sure that Gonzales is making a good case for himself by not recalling the intent of most of his public statements and/or actions taken over the past six months.

Edit: According to the LA Times on April 20, Gonzales claimed to be "unable to recall" over 50 times! Prevarication or early onset alzheimer's...?

Also, Talkingpointsmemo deserves props for breaking this story. It's too bad that the Pulitzer Board does not recognize exclusively online news coverage. The folks at TPM had the instincts and resources to bring to light a scandal that traditional media outlets missed. It's time to embrace our brave new technological world, people.

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

"Virginia Tech"

Maybe this is a bit abstract and irrelevant given the sadness of what happened at VT, but I'm struck by the thought that our cultural lexicon will be forever changed by this. When you say "Columbine," people do not think "town in Colorado where three members of Big Head Todd and the Monsters grew up." They think "school shootings." In fact, google "Columbine, CO" and you'll see that the first hit is a wikipedia article on the Columbine High School massacre, second is an article about the city itself.

So I'm left with a sad thought for the university. Who would choose to move to Columbine, CO to attend high school there, given what it signifies? I've never been there myself, and I'm sure current students find this line of thinking a tiresome and obnoxious. And the infamous school library has been demolished and rebuilt. Nevertheless, wouldn't you find it a bit creepy to walk the halls of that school knowing what had happened there?

So what will happen to VT? Will it suffer the same semantic fate, forever redefined to mean a place of killing rather than a place of learning? If so, I would expect enrollment and application rates to suffer, at the least. For better or for worse, things are defined by what happens to them as much as what they do themselves. And unfortunately, we don't have all that much control over what happens to us.

Monday, April 16, 2007

But for 1.5 ounces, the kingdom was lost

I flew from San Francisco to Los Angeles yesterday, and apparently hair gel is a deadly terrorist weapon.  I know this is old news, and I should just get used to it, but the restriction is kind of dumb - apparently 3.5 oz is ok, anything over is verboten.  So my hair gel comes in a 5 oz container, which makes it way too dangerous.  Never mind that the container was half empty.  I even offered to just empty half of the remaining gel right there on the spot - that way it would have to be under the limit.  But no, I was told, they have to go by the volume printed on the container, regardless of anything else.  So I guess next time I fly, I'll carefully scratch off all of the capacities on the containers and hand-write in "3.4 oz."  Doing my part to make the country safe.

Friday, April 13, 2007

Our first post

We are the boos. We will post pictures of our cats and such. We have lots of interesting thoughts about the world. Yah for us!